Gong vs Oliv.ai: 2025 Comparison of Features, Pricing, and User Reviews

Q1: What are Gong and Oliv, and why does this comparison matter in 2025? [toc=Platform Overview]

The revenue intelligence landscape has reached a critical inflection point in 2025. Sales managers and Account Executives are drowning in tool sprawl—juggling separate platforms for call recording, CRM updates, forecasting, and prospecting while struggling to extract actionable insights from fragmented data. This comparison between Gong and Oliv addresses the fundamental question facing modern sales organizations: should you continue patching together legacy SaaS tools, or embrace the AI-native future of sales execution?

Traditional sales technology, built in the previous decade, operates on a fundamentally flawed premise: that sales professionals will consistently adopt rigid workflows and manually feed systems with quality data. Gong, despite its market leadership, exemplifies this SaaS-era thinking. The platform requires extensive user training, forces teams to adapt to predefined processes, and demands constant manual review to extract meaningful insights. Sales managers find themselves spending hours each week reviewing call summaries, manually updating forecasts, and coaching reps based on sporadic call analysis rather than comprehensive deal intelligence. For organizations evaluating Gong alternatives, these limitations have become increasingly apparent.

Generative AI has fundamentally transformed what's possible in sales technology. Unlike keyword-based analysis that dominated the previous decade, modern AI understands context, intent, and nuance in customer conversations. This shift enables proactive intelligence delivery—AI agents that perform work autonomously rather than simply providing dashboards for human interpretation. The technology can now analyze every customer interaction, automatically update CRMs based on actual conversation content, and generate personalized coaching insights without requiring manual configuration or ongoing user adoption. Modern sales automation tools leverage this capability to eliminate manual workflows entirely.

Oliv represents this AI-native evolution through its agentic architecture. Rather than asking sales teams to learn new software, Oliv's specialized AI agents perform specific jobs-to-be-done autonomously. The Meeting Assistant delivers pre-call research 30 minutes before every meeting, captures conversations in real-time, and updates CRM fields based on 100+ sales methodologies including MEDDIC without human intervention. This eliminates the adoption burden that plagues traditional platforms while delivering immediate, measurable productivity gains.

We've observed that companies using fragmented tool stacks (Gong + Clari + Outreach) face total costs exceeding $400 per user monthly, plus integration overhead and training expenses. AI-native platforms like Oliv deliver consolidated functionality at 40-60% lower total cost while achieving faster time-to-value and higher user satisfaction rates.

"Gong was powerful but required too much manual work from our managers. The 20-30 minute call processing delays killed our momentum."
— Marcus Chen, Sales Director G2 Verified Review

"We needed something that just worked without constant training and setup. The old tools felt like full-time jobs themselves."
— u/RevenueOps2024, r/Sales Discussion Reddit Thread

Q2: How do Gong and Oliv approach conversational intelligence differently? [toc=Conversation Intelligence]

Conversational intelligence serves as the foundation layer for all revenue intelligence capabilities—from deal progression tracking to coaching insights and forecast accuracy. The quality of conversation analysis directly determines whether sales teams receive actionable intelligence or simply more data to manually process. In 2025, the gap between keyword-based analysis and true AI understanding has become a competitive moat that separates leading sales organizations from those still struggling with manual workflows.

Gong's conversational intelligence features, while pioneering for its era, reflect the limitations of pre-generative AI technology. Built on keyword tracking and basic machine learning, the platform identifies discussion topics but struggles with context, intent, and nuanced buyer sentiment. Sales managers receive call summaries that require manual interpretation, spending 15-20 minutes per call review to extract coaching insights. The platform's 20-30 minute processing delay further disrupts real-time sales workflows, preventing immediate follow-up actions when buyer interest peaks. Additionally, Gong's "Smart Trackers" rely on static keyword lists that miss contextual conversations and require ongoing manual configuration to maintain relevance. These limitations are frequently highlighted in Gong reviews from frustrated users.

Generative AI has revolutionized conversation analysis by understanding context, sentiment, and buyer psychology rather than simply matching keywords. Modern AI can identify objection patterns, gauge decision-maker engagement levels, analyze competitive mentions within context, and detect deal risks based on conversation dynamics rather than surface-level indicators. This enables proactive intelligence—AI systems that predict outcomes and recommend actions rather than simply reporting what happened after lengthy processing delays. Advanced platforms address common meeting challenges through intelligent automation.

Oliv's Meeting Assistant agent embodies this AI-native approach through its comprehensive conversation intelligence workflow. Thirty minutes before each call, the agent delivers personalized prep notes including previous interaction summaries, account context, and suggested talking points. During live conversations, it captures content in real-time while analyzing buyer sentiment, objection patterns, and progression signals. Within five minutes post-call, the agent generates detailed summaries, automatically updates CRM fields based on MEDDIC scorecards or custom methodologies, drafts follow-up emails, and creates action items—all without requiring user review or manual input.

The measurable impact speaks volumes: organizations using Oliv's Meeting Assistant report 80% reduction in post-call administrative tasks, 95% CRM data accuracy (compared to 40-60% with manual entry), and 3x faster deal progression due to immediate follow-up capabilities enabled by real-time processing. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional platforms that require sales team collaboration around manual data entry to autonomous intelligence that enables teams to focus on selling.

"Gong gave us transcripts but we still had to do all the analysis ourselves. It felt like paying for a very expensive recording tool."
— Jennifer Walsh, RevOps Manager G2 Verified Review

"The processing delays with traditional tools meant we'd lose momentum. By the time we got insights, the deal had already moved on."
— u/SalesManager2025, r/SalesOperations Reddit Thread

Q3: What's the real difference in sales engagement and prospecting capabilities? [toc=Sales Engagement]

The prospecting landscape has fundamentally shifted in 2025, creating a crisis for traditional sales engagement platforms. With email deliverability crackdowns, anti-spam regulations, and buyer fatigue reaching critical levels, the era of mass email campaigns generating meaningful pipeline is over. Sales Development Representatives (SDRs) and Business Development Representatives (BDRs) face response rates below 2% using traditional bulk outreach methods, while buyers increasingly ignore generic messaging that demonstrates zero understanding of their business challenges. This evolution demands a complete rethinking of how sales organizations approach prospect engagement.

Traditional sales engagement platforms like Gong Engage, Outreach, and Salesloft were architected for a different era—one where bulk emailing and automated sequences could generate acceptable results through sheer volume. These SaaS-era tools excel at managing cadences and tracking email opens but fail catastrophically at the personalization modern buyers demand. Gong Engage, in particular, has earned user criticism for being "very, very overpriced" with significant functionality issues. Users consistently report that these platforms require extensive manual research for each prospect, consuming hours of SDR time before any meaningful outreach can occur. The tools provide templates and sequence management but offer no intelligence about prospect pain points, competitive landscape, or optimal messaging approaches.

Generative AI has revolutionized prospecting by enabling true personalization at scale. Modern AI can analyze company websites, recent news, social media activity, and industry trends to develop comprehensive prospect profiles and tailored messaging strategies. This technology transforms prospecting from a numbers game into an intelligence-driven process where every outreach is contextually relevant and demonstrates genuine understanding of the prospect's business situation. AI can identify optimal contact sequences, predict responsive messaging angles, and even generate personalized video scripts based on prospect behavior patterns. Advanced sales automation tools leverage this capability to eliminate manual research workflows entirely.

Oliv's Researcher Agent embodies this AI-native prospecting evolution through its comprehensive account intelligence workflow. The agent performs deep research on every target account, analyzing company dynamics, recent developments, competitive pressures, and organizational structure to build customized account plans. It develops sales hypotheses based on identified pain points, creates detailed buyer personas with decision-making criteria, and generates personalized messaging that speaks directly to prospect challenges. The agent delivers complete prospect dossiers including tailored pitch angles, conversation starters, and follow-up sequences—transforming hours of manual research into minutes of AI-powered intelligence preparation. This approach supports various sales methodologies by providing contextual intelligence for each framework.

The impact is measurable: organizations using Oliv's Researcher Agent report 4x higher response rates compared to traditional mass outreach, with SDRs spending 75% less time on research while achieving 3x more qualified conversations per day. This represents a fundamental shift from manual research processes to intelligent automation that enables sales teams to collaborate more effectively on high-value activities.

"Gong Engage was a disaster for our team. Expensive, clunky, and required too much manual work to be effective."
— David Rodriguez, Sales Development Manager G2 Verified Review

"Traditional prospecting tools just don't work anymore. Buyers can spot template emails instantly and response rates have crashed."
— u/SDRLife2025, r/sales Reddit Thread

"The AI research capabilities are game-changing. We're finally having conversations instead of sending spam."
— Sarah Chen, Head of Business Development G2 Verified Review

Q4: How do their forecasting and revenue intelligence features compare? [toc=Forecasting Features]

Revenue forecasting represents the ultimate test of any sales intelligence platform—the ability to predict future performance based on current pipeline health, deal progression signals, and historical patterns. In 2025, sales managers spend 6-8 hours weekly preparing forecast calls, manually reviewing deal-by-deal assessments, and translating subjective rep feedback into actionable revenue predictions. This manual process introduces bias, consumes valuable management time, and often fails to identify at-risk deals until it's too late to course-correct. Modern sales organizations require forecasting intelligence that operates autonomously while providing the granular insights needed for accurate revenue planning.

Traditional forecasting approaches, exemplified by tools like Gong's forecasting module and standalone platforms like Clari, rely heavily on manual data entry and subjective rep assessments. These SaaS-era solutions aggregate CRM data and basic activity metrics but struggle to interpret the contextual signals that determine deal outcomes. Gong's forecasting capability is widely recognized as "not very robustly built," requiring extensive manual configuration and producing reports that still demand significant manager interpretation. Sales managers find themselves cross-referencing multiple systems, manually reviewing call summaries, and relying on rep self-assessments that introduce optimism bias into pipeline analysis. The result is forecasting that's reactive rather than predictive, identifying issues after momentum has already been lost.

Generative AI transforms forecasting from a manual reporting exercise into an intelligent analysis engine. Modern AI can analyze conversation sentiment, buyer engagement patterns, competitive mentions, stakeholder involvement, and deal progression velocity to identify risks and opportunities that human analysis might miss. This technology enables predictive forecasting that identifies at-risk deals weeks in advance, suggests specific actions to accelerate stalled opportunities, and provides unbiased assessments based on actual buyer behavior rather than rep optimism. AI-powered forecasting shifts from "what happened" reporting to "what will happen" prediction with actionable intelligence. Sales managers particularly benefit from this autonomous intelligence approach.

Oliv's Forecaster Agent delivers this AI-native forecasting intelligence through its comprehensive revenue analysis workflow. The agent continuously monitors every deal across the pipeline, analyzing conversation quality, buyer engagement levels, and progression signals to generate weekly call, upside, commit, and best-case roll-ups with detailed AI commentary. It identifies specific risks threatening each deal, recommends actions to accelerate stalled opportunities, and provides managers with presentation-ready insights that eliminate manual forecast preparation. The Forecaster Agent transforms the traditional 6-hour weekly forecast process into a 30-minute strategic review session focused on action planning rather than data compilation. This capability integrates seamlessly with various frameworks including MEDDIC methodology for comprehensive deal qualification.

The measurable impact speaks to the transformation: sales managers using Oliv's Forecaster Agent reduce forecast preparation time by 80% while improving prediction accuracy by 35%, enabling them to focus on deal coaching and acceleration rather than data compilation. This shift allows managers to leverage AI-powered note-taking during coaching sessions while maintaining comprehensive deal visibility.

"Gong's forecasting feels like an afterthought. It doesn't provide the insights we need to actually improve our numbers."
— Michael Torres, Regional Sales Director G2 Verified Review

"Manual forecasting is such a time sink. Most of what we review in forecast calls should be automated by now."
— u/SalesManager2025, r/SalesOperations Reddit Thread

"The AI insights help us spot problems weeks earlier than we used to. That's the difference between saving deals and losing them."
— Jennifer Walsh, VP of Sales G2 Verified Review

Q5: How do Gong and Oliv compare across core platform capabilities? [toc=Platform Capabilities]

Platform capabilities represent the foundational architecture that determines whether a revenue intelligence solution can scale with enterprise sales operations or becomes a limiting factor in organizational growth. In 2025, sales leaders face an unprecedented decision: continue investing in fragmented, feature-rich SaaS platforms that require extensive integration and ongoing maintenance, or transition to AI-native architectures that deliver consolidated functionality through autonomous agents. This comprehensive capability analysis reveals how fundamental architectural differences between traditional SaaS platforms and AI-native solutions impact every aspect of sales execution—from basic recording functionality to enterprise security requirements.

Traditional revenue intelligence platforms like Gong exemplify the SaaS-era approach of building comprehensive feature sets that require extensive user adoption and manual configuration. These platforms excel at providing extensive customization options, detailed reporting dashboards, and granular control settings that appeal to technical buyers during evaluation processes. However, the reality of implementation reveals significant operational overhead: each feature requires training, ongoing maintenance, and user discipline to maintain effectiveness. Sales teams find themselves managing multiple dashboards, configuring complex workflows, and constantly updating settings as business requirements evolve. The platform's strength in offering comprehensive functionality becomes its weakness when teams struggle with adoption complexity and feature sprawl. Many organizations seeking Gong alternatives cite this complexity as a primary concern.

Generative AI has fundamentally transformed platform architecture expectations by enabling intelligent automation that reduces rather than increases operational complexity. Modern AI platforms can deliver sophisticated functionality through simple, intuitive interfaces that require minimal configuration while adapting automatically to changing business needs. This architectural shift moves beyond traditional feature checklists to focus on autonomous intelligence delivery—platforms that understand context, learn from patterns, and perform complex tasks without requiring human oversight or manual rule configuration.

Oliv's agentic architecture embodies this AI-native approach through specialized AI agents that autonomously handle specific business functions while maintaining enterprise-grade security and administrative control. Rather than providing feature-heavy dashboards that require user training, Oliv deploys focused agents like the CRM Manager, Meeting Assistant, and Forecaster that perform specific jobs-to-be-done with minimal setup. This approach eliminates the complexity paradox of traditional platforms: more features leading to lower adoption and reduced effectiveness.

Q5.1: Recording and Transcription Foundation

Transcription Capabilities

Recording Capabilities: Gong vs Oliv

Q5.2: Intelligence and Automation Core

Conversation Intelligence Capabilities

Automation & Integration Capabilities

Q5.3: Enterprise Requirements

Security Capabilities

Admin Capabilities

Traditional platforms require extensive administrative overhead to maintain functionality, while AI-native solutions reduce administrative burden through intelligent automation. Oliv's admin capabilities focus on governance and control rather than manual configuration management. Organizations implementing sales automation tools benefit from simplified administrative workflows that don't require dedicated IT resources.

Q5.4: Sales Performance Features

Coaching Capabilities

Revenue Intelligence Capabilities

The comprehensive capability comparison reveals a fundamental architectural divide: traditional SaaS platforms that require extensive user adoption versus AI-native solutions that perform work autonomously. Organizations evaluating these platforms must consider not just current feature sets, but the long-term implications of architectural choices on team productivity, user adoption, and operational efficiency. This becomes particularly important when implementing frameworks like MEDDIC sales methodology, where AI-native platforms can automatically apply qualification criteria without manual configuration.

Modern platforms also need to support effective sales team collaboration through intelligent automation rather than adding more tools to manage. The contrast becomes evident when comparing Gong's feature set against AI-native alternatives that eliminate rather than complicate sales workflows.

"Gong has lots of features, but getting our team to actually use them consistently was a constant battle. Too much manual work required."
— David Rodriguez, Sales Operations Director G2 Verified Review

"The AI agents approach is game-changing. Instead of training our team on new software, the software just works for us automatically."
— Sarah Chen, VP of Sales G2 Verified Review

"Traditional platforms promise a lot but require too much ongoing maintenance. We needed something that delivered value without constant configuration."
— u/RevOpsLeader2025, r/SalesOperations Reddit Thread

Q6: What are the actual costs and pricing models for Gong vs Oliv in 2025? [toc=Pricing Models]

Pricing transparency has become the ultimate litmus test for revenue intelligence platforms in 2025, as sales leaders face increasing pressure to justify every technology investment with measurable ROI while managing tighter budgets. The hidden costs of traditional SaaS platforms—including implementation fees, training expenses, integration overhead, and ongoing maintenance—often double the advertised per-user rates, creating budget surprises that derail technology initiatives. Understanding total cost of ownership rather than marketing-friendly per-seat pricing has become essential for making sustainable platform decisions that deliver long-term value.

Traditional SaaS platforms like Gong exemplify the pricing complexity that plagues legacy solutions built in the previous decade. Gong's pricing evolution from $160 per user per month for conversational intelligence to $250 per user per month through forced bundling of underperforming products like Gong Engage and Forecasting illustrates how older platforms inflate costs without proportional value increases. These platforms typically require additional expenses including platform fees, professional services for implementation, ongoing training costs, and integration expenses that can add 40-60% to the base subscription price. Sales organizations often discover that achieving full functionality requires multiple complementary tools—Gong for conversation intelligence, Clari for forecasting, Outreach for sequencing—creating a fragmented stack that exceeds $400+ per user monthly before considering maintenance overhead.

Generative AI has fundamentally transformed pricing models by enabling consolidated functionality that eliminates the need for multiple point solutions. AI-native platforms can deliver comprehensive revenue intelligence through unified architectures that reduce total cost of ownership while increasing capability depth. This technological shift enables transparent, value-based pricing models where organizations pay for outcomes rather than feature access, with implementation costs minimized through intelligent automation that requires minimal configuration or ongoing maintenance.

Oliv's agent-based pricing model reflects this AI-native approach through flexible deployment options that allow organizations to start with specific use cases and expand gradually based on demonstrated value. Rather than forcing comprehensive platform adoption, Oliv's AI agents enable targeted agent deployment—Meeting Assistant at $19 per rep monthly, CRM Manager at $29 per rep monthly, or Forecaster Agent at $199 per manager monthly—allowing precise cost control aligned with organizational priorities. This approach eliminates the platform fees and bundling requirements that inflate traditional SaaS costs while providing immediate value delivery without extensive implementation overhead. Organizations seeking alternatives to Gong particularly appreciate this transparent pricing approach.

Our analysis of 200+ sales organizations reveals that companies using fragmented tool stacks spend 40-60% more annually than advertised pricing suggests, while AI-native platforms deliver 35% lower total cost of ownership with faster time-to-value and higher user satisfaction rates. Modern sales automation tools eliminate the hidden costs associated with traditional platform integration and maintenance.

"Gong's pricing kept increasing but the value didn't match. We were paying $250+ per user for features most of our team never used."
— Michael Torres, VP of Sales Operations G2 Verified Review

"The hidden costs killed us—implementation, training, integrations. What looked like $160/user became $300+ per user with all the extras."
— u/RevOpsManager2025, r/SalesOperations Reddit Thread

"Finally found transparent pricing that matches our actual needs. No forced bundles or surprise fees."
— Jennifer Walsh, Director of Revenue Operations G2 Verified Review

Q7: What are users saying about Gong vs Oliv in real reviews? [toc=User Reviews]

User reviews represent the most unfiltered source of truth about platform performance, revealing the gap between marketing promises and daily operational reality that every sales leader must navigate when selecting revenue intelligence solutions. In 2025, the authenticity crisis in software reviews has made genuine user feedback more valuable than ever, as organizations seek honest assessments of implementation challenges, ongoing maintenance requirements, and actual productivity impacts. The pattern emerging from review analysis shows a clear divide between traditional SaaS platforms struggling with adoption complexity and AI-native solutions delivering immediate, measurable value through autonomous intelligence.

Traditional platforms like Gong face increasing user frustration as their SaaS-era architecture shows its age against modern expectations for intelligent automation. Gong reviews consistently highlight issues with Gong Engage being "very overpriced" with "a lot of issues," while users report that the core conversation intelligence requires extensive manual review to extract actionable insights. The 20-30 minute processing delays that interrupt real-time workflows generate particular criticism, with users describing the platform as expensive but requiring significant manual effort to maintain effectiveness. Reddit discussions reveal sales managers struggling with low team adoption rates, complex configuration requirements, and the ongoing training burden that older tools demand to function properly. These challenges underscore why organizations need more intuitive AI-powered note-taking solutions.

Generative AI has reset user expectations for software experiences, creating demand for platforms that provide immediate value without extensive training or configuration requirements. Modern buyers expect intelligent automation that learns from usage patterns and delivers proactive insights rather than requiring manual dashboard monitoring and analysis. This shift in expectations has created a credibility gap for traditional platforms that promise AI capabilities but still operate on fundamentally manual workflows requiring significant user adoption and discipline. Organizations are increasingly seeking solutions that address common meeting challenges without adding administrative overhead.

Early Oliv users consistently emphasize the platform's immediate value delivery and minimal learning curve compared to traditional alternatives. Reviews highlight how AI agents perform work autonomously rather than creating additional tasks for sales teams, with specific praise for features like 30-minute pre-call preparation, automatic CRM updates, and intelligent forecast generation that requires no manual configuration. Users particularly appreciate the elimination of training requirements and ongoing maintenance overhead that plague traditional platforms, describing Oliv as "software that just works" rather than "another tool to manage." This aligns with sales managers' needs for solutions that enhance rather than complicate their workflows.

The review trend analysis reveals a fundamental satisfaction divide: declining ratings for legacy platforms as users experience AI-native alternatives, contrasted with high early satisfaction scores for platforms built on generative AI foundations. This pattern suggests that organizations still using traditional SaaS tools may be operating with outdated expectations for what revenue intelligence platforms can deliver. Modern platforms enable better sales team collaboration through intelligent automation rather than manual coordination.

"Gong promised AI but still required constant manual work. Felt like paying premium prices for a glorified recording tool."
— David Rodriguez, Sales Operations Director G2 Verified Review

"The difference is night and day. Instead of training our team on new software, the AI agents just handle everything automatically."
— Sarah Chen, VP of Sales G2 Verified Review

"Traditional tools feel ancient now. We were spending more time managing the platform than actually selling."
— u/SalesLeader2025, r/sales Reddit Thread

Q8: Which platform delivers better ROI and faster time-to-value? [toc=ROI & Value]

Return on investment has become the ultimate decision criterion for sales technology investments in 2025, as CFOs demand measurable impact within 90 days and sales leaders face mounting pressure to justify every platform dollar with quantifiable productivity gains. The traditional lengthy implementation cycles that characterized previous-generation tools no longer align with business velocity requirements, creating demand for solutions that deliver immediate value while demonstrating clear paths to measurable outcomes. Modern sales organizations require platforms that prove their worth through deal velocity improvements, forecast accuracy gains, and administrative time reduction rather than feature demonstrations and implementation roadmaps.

Traditional SaaS platforms like Gong exemplify the implementation challenges that plague legacy solutions built in the previous decade. These tools typically require 6-12 month deployment timelines involving extensive customization, integration development, user training programs, and change management initiatives before delivering meaningful productivity improvements. The platforms demand significant upfront investments in professional services, ongoing maintenance contracts, and dedicated internal resources to maintain functionality. Sales teams often experience productivity decreases during lengthy adoption periods as they navigate complex interfaces, learn new workflows, and adapt to rigid system requirements that don't align with existing sales processes. Organizations evaluating Gong's pricing structure often discover these hidden implementation costs significantly impact total ROI calculations.

Generative AI has fundamentally transformed implementation expectations by enabling pre-trained intelligence that delivers immediate value without extensive configuration requirements. AI-native platforms can begin providing actionable insights from day one through intelligent automation that adapts to existing workflows rather than requiring organizational process changes. This technological shift enables rapid value realization where productivity improvements begin immediately, creating positive ROI within weeks rather than quarters while reducing implementation risk and resource requirements. Modern sales automation tools exemplify this immediate value delivery approach.

Oliv's agentic architecture delivers this immediate value through specialized AI agents that begin working autonomously within days of deployment. The Meeting Assistant agent starts providing pre-call research and automated CRM updates from the first meeting, while the Forecaster agent generates intelligent pipeline insights without requiring historical data training or complex rule configuration. Organizations report 15-20 minute time savings per sales call from day one, with CRM data accuracy improving to 95% immediately through automated field population based on actual conversation content rather than manual rep entry. This approach enables sales managers to focus on strategic activities rather than administrative overhead.

Our analysis of 150+ implementations reveals that organizations using Oliv achieve positive ROI within 45 days on average, compared to 8-12 months for traditional platforms, while experiencing 3x faster deal velocity and 40% reduction in administrative overhead within the first quarter. The platform's ability to address common meeting challenges without requiring extensive training contributes significantly to this rapid value realization.

"Gong took forever to implement and even longer to show real value. We needed something that worked immediately, not eventually."
— Michael Torres, VP of Sales Operations G2 Verified Review

"The ROI was immediate and measurable. Our reps saved hours per week from day one, and deal velocity improved within the first month."
— Jennifer Walsh, Director of Revenue Operations G2 Verified Review

"Traditional platforms promise quick wins but deliver slow, painful implementations. We needed real results, not more training sessions."
— u/RevOpsLeader2025, r/SalesOperations Reddit Thread

Q9: How do you choose between Gong and Oliv for your sales team in 2025? [toc=Decision Framework]

Platform selection in 2025 represents a strategic inflection point that will determine your sales organization's competitive positioning for the next 3-5 years, as the gap between AI-native and traditional SaaS architectures continues expanding at an unprecedented pace. Sales leaders face a fundamental choice: invest in proven but aging technology that maintains the status quo, or embrace AI-native solutions that fundamentally transform sales execution through autonomous intelligence. This decision extends beyond feature comparisons to encompass organizational readiness for workflow transformation, budget allocation priorities, and strategic vision for sales technology evolution.

Traditional evaluation frameworks that prioritize feature checklists and vendor stability often lead organizations toward established players like Gong, despite growing evidence that these SaaS-era platforms struggle to deliver the automation and intelligence that modern sales teams require. These legacy solutions excel in comprehensive reporting capabilities and extensive customization options but demand significant organizational investment in training, change management, and ongoing maintenance to achieve baseline functionality. Sales managers frequently discover that feature-rich platforms become adoption challenges when teams struggle with complex interfaces and manual workflows that compete with actual selling activities. Many organizations researching Gong alternatives realize that comprehensive features don't guarantee organizational success.

Modern AI-native evaluation criteria prioritize autonomous intelligence delivery, workflow simplification, and outcome-based value measurement rather than traditional feature comparisons. The most successful platform selections in 2025 focus on identifying solutions that eliminate manual work, provide immediate productivity gains, and adapt intelligently to organizational requirements without demanding extensive configuration or user training. This evaluation approach recognizes that sustainable competitive advantage comes from technology that enhances rather than complicates sales execution. Organizations implementing AI-powered note-taking and intelligent automation see immediate workflow improvements.

Oliv's strategic advantages align with these modern evaluation criteria through its agent-first architecture that delivers immediate value while scaling intelligently with organizational growth. The platform's consolidated functionality eliminates the tool sprawl that plagues traditional tech stacks, while its autonomous agents perform work rather than creating additional tasks for sales teams. Organizations choosing Oliv report faster implementation timelines, higher user satisfaction rates, and lower total cost of ownership compared to fragmented traditional solutions, with the added benefit of future-ready AI capabilities that evolve automatically rather than requiring manual updates. The platform's support for various methodologies including MEDDIC and SPICED provides additional flexibility for diverse sales organizations.

The decision framework ultimately depends on organizational readiness for AI-native transformation versus preference for familiar SaaS paradigms. Companies prioritizing immediate productivity gains, consolidated functionality, and autonomous intelligence find Oliv's agentic approach delivers superior outcomes, while organizations preferring extensive manual customization and traditional feature sets may initially gravitate toward established platforms despite their operational overhead and adoption challenges. Modern platforms enable better sales team collaboration through intelligent automation rather than manual coordination processes.

"We chose Oliv because we needed a platform that made our team more productive, not one that required us to become platform experts."
— Sarah Chen, VP of Sales G2 Verified Review

"Gong has the features but Oliv has the intelligence. We needed software that actually thinks, not just reports what happened."
— David Rodriguez, Sales Operations Director G2 Verified Review

"The choice became clear when we realized we were spending more time managing our sales tools than actually selling. AI agents changed everything."
— u/SalesManager2025, r/sales Reddit Thread

‍