Sales productivity metrics to track

We recommend tracking metrics at two distinct levels: organizational and individual. At the business level, focus on sales revenue (total income from sales activities), customer acquisition cost (CAC showing spend per new customer), customer lifetime value (CLTV predicting relationship value), conversion rate (percentage of leads becoming customers), customer retention rate (percentage of customers who stay), net promoter score (NPS measuring loyalty), sales cycle length (time from lead to customer), and sales pipeline coverage (ensuring enough deals to meet targets).​

At the sales professional level, essential metrics include leads generated (new potential customers per rep), average deal size (revenue per sale), quota attainment (meeting or exceeding targets), win/loss rate (deals won versus lost), sales activity metrics (calls, emails, meetings, proposals), and productivity per sales rep (output per person).​

The key is tracking metrics that provide actionable insights rather than just generating numbers. We recommend exploring our AI-native Revenue Orchestration platform to automatically capture and analyze these metrics without manual data entry across your entire sales organization.​

‍

Customer acquisition cost shows how much you spend to get each new customer through the door, serving as a reality check for your sales and marketing efforts. The fundamental principle is ensuring you're not spending more to acquire a customer than they're worth.​

To calculate CAC accurately, sum all sales and marketing expenses over a specific period (including salaries, advertising spend, software costs, agency fees, and overhead) and divide by the number of new customers acquired during that same timeframe. For example, if you spent $50,000 on sales and marketing in a quarter and acquired 50 customers, your CAC is $1,000.​

The metric becomes truly valuable when compared against customer lifetime value (CLTV). A healthy ratio is typically 3:1, meaning each customer generates three times more value than they cost to acquire. If your CAC exceeds or approaches CLTV, you need to reevaluate your acquisition strategy immediately.​

We track CAC automatically by connecting to your CRM and financial systems, providing real-time visibility into acquisition efficiency. Start a free trial to see how our platform surfaces CAC trends and alerts you to efficiency changes across channels and campaigns.​

‍

While both metrics measure sales effectiveness, they track different stages of your sales funnel and serve distinct purposes.​

Conversion rate measures the percentage of leads that turn into customers across your entire funnel. It's a broad effectiveness metric showing whether your overall sales process and marketing efforts are hitting the mark. If conversion rate is low, it signals fundamental issues with lead quality, messaging, or sales approach requiring immediate attention. You calculate it as: (Number of customers acquired ÷ Total leads) × 100.​

Win/loss rate is a more granular metric specific to individual sales reps or opportunities that entered active sales stages. It compares the number of deals won to those lost, providing insights into a sales rep's closing effectiveness once an opportunity is qualified. This ratio helps identify individual strengths and areas for improvement, ensuring your team becomes more successful over time. Calculate it as: Deals won ÷ (Deals won + Deals lost).​

Essentially, conversion rate looks at the entire funnel from lead to customer, while win/loss rate focuses specifically on qualified opportunities in active sales stages. Our platform automatically tracks both metrics with drill-down capabilities by rep, product, region, and deal stage.​

‍

Quota attainment is the most straightforward metric showing which sales reps are meeting or exceeding their targets, serving as a clear indicator of individual performance. It directly rewards those who contribute most to the company's sales goals, making it the definitive measurement of rep effectiveness.​

Unlike activity metrics (calls made, emails sent) that measure effort, quota attainment measures results. A rep can have high activity scores but low quota attainment, revealing that their efforts aren't translating into closed business. Conversely, high quota attainment with lower activity suggests exceptional efficiency and deal quality.​

The metric also enables fair performance comparisons across reps with different territories, product lines, or market segments when quotas are properly calibrated. It provides objective data for compensation decisions, promotion considerations, and coaching prioritization.​

However, we recommend analyzing quota attainment alongside complementary metrics like average deal size, win/loss rate, and sales activity metrics to understand the complete performance picture. For example, a rep with 120% quota attainment but declining average deal size might be cherry-picking easy wins rather than pursuing strategic accounts.​

Our Forecaster agent automatically tracks quota attainment in real-time with predictive analytics showing which reps will likely miss targets, allowing proactive coaching interventions.​

‍

Sales activity metrics—including calls made, emails sent, meetings scheduled, and proposals delivered—provide a window into the daily efforts of your sales team, showing who's putting in the work to close deals. However, these metrics represent inputs, not outputs.​

The connection to actual productivity depends on correlation with results. High activity should translate to more leads generated, better quota attainment, and higher productivity per sales rep (revenue or deals closed per person). When activity metrics rise but productivity metrics stagnate or decline, you've identified a critical efficiency problem.​

We recommend establishing activity baselines for successful reps, then using those benchmarks to identify underperformers. For example, if top performers average 50 outbound calls daily with a 15% connection rate and 30% meeting-set rate, reps with similar activity but lower connection rates need coaching on messaging and timing.​

The real value emerges when you analyze activity patterns across the sales cycle. Winning deals typically show consistent touchpoint patterns—initial discovery calls, follow-up emails, demo meetings, proposal presentations, and negotiation discussions in predictable sequences. Deviations from these patterns indicate where deals go off track.​

Our AI Data Platform automatically captures all sales activities from calls, emails, and meetings without manual logging, correlates them with deal outcomes, and identifies which activity patterns predict wins versus losses.​

‍

Traditional sales tools like Gong, Clari, and Salesforce Einstein require significant manual data entry, impose standardized workflows that rarely fit your specific process, and bury users in disconnected data rather than delivering actionable insights. We've built our platform to solve these exact failures through AI-native Revenue Orchestration.​

Our architecture operates on two interconnected layers:​

AI Data Platform automatically tracks and manages all sales data from calls, emails, and meetings without any manual entry. Unlike competitors that require reps to log activities and update CRM fields, we capture everything automatically—sales revenue per rep, leads generated, meeting outcomes, email engagement, and deal progression.​

Customizable AI Agents execute specific workflows tailored to your organization's unique processes. Our agents don't just track metrics; they analyze patterns and deliver insights proactively.​

Key productivity-tracking advantages include:

• Meeting Assistant ($19/month) automatically logs all sales activities—calls made, meetings conducted, follow-ups sent—eliminating manual activity tracking​
• CRM Manager ($29/month) updates quota attainment, pipeline coverage, and deal progression in real-time by auto-filling CRM fields​
• Forecaster (alpha) calculates win/loss rates, sales cycle length, and conversion rates automatically by inspecting every deal in your pipeline​
• Analyst Agent allows natural language queries like "Show me average deal size by rep this quarter" without building custom reports​

Unlike Gong's 3-6 month implementation requiring third-party vendors, we deploy in days with just three meetings to understand your methodology. Start your free trial to see automated productivity tracking with zero manual data entry.​

‍

Companies frequently stack Gong for conversational intelligence and Clari for forecasting because neither tool alone provides comprehensive productivity visibility. This approach creates massive cost inefficiencies, data silos, and workflow fragmentation.​

Here's the financial reality:

Traditional Stack Costs:

• Gong: $160-$250 per user per month, plus $5,000+ base platform fee, plus $10,000-$30,000 implementation fees​
• Clari: ~$100-$200 per user per month with add-ons (Copilot, Groove), plus platform and implementation fees​
• Combined total: Approximately $500 per user per month for a 50-person team = $25,000 monthly or $300,000 annually​

For a 100-person sales organization, you're looking at $600,000 annually just for these two tools, not including integration costs, training time, or the RevOps resources needed to manually extract insights from their "wonky APIs".​

Oliv AI Unified Approach:

• Starter: $19/user/month for baseline conversational intelligence​
• Standard: $49/user/month with meeting insights​
• Supreme: $89/user/month with combined insights, deal scorecards, and forecasting​
• No platform fees, implementation fees, or training costs​

For that same 100-person team using our Supreme tier: $8,900 monthly or $106,800 annually. That's an 82% cost reduction while delivering superior functionality through our generative AI-native foundation.​

We also offer special discounts for teams migrating from Gong. Book a call with our founder to discuss your specific migration timeline and cost savings.​

‍